In Battlefield 6, the Core i7-5775C is slightly slower than the Core i9-10900F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-5775C
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-10900F
- Up to 16% faster in Battlefield 6 – 88 vs 76 FPS
- Up to 16% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 4 years and 11 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs May 15, 2015
- Is 4 years and 11 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i7-5775C vs Core i9-10900F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-5775C
May 15th, 2015
Average FPS
76 FPS
86%
Min 1% FPS
57 FPS
86%
Price, $
$400
100%
Value, $/FPS
$5.26/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-5775C vs Core i9-10900F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-5775C vs Core i9-10900F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-5775C
May 15th, 2015
Cores
4-core
40%
L3 Cache
6 MB
30%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
71%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
55%
Core i9-10900F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
85%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-5775C May 15th, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-10900F Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 15th, 2015 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
$366.00 | MSRP | $464.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1200 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
