The Core i7-4860HQ is a slightly faster gaming CPU than the Athlon 3000G. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i7-4860HQ
- A slightly faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of the Athlon 3000G
- Consumes up to 26% less energy – 35 vs 47 Watts
Core i7-4860HQ vs Athlon 3000G for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-4860HQ
Feb 1st, 2014
Average FPS
179
100%
Min 1% FPS
119
100%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Athlon 3000G
Nov 20th, 2019
Average FPS
177
99%
Min 1% FPS
118
99%
Price, €
€52.6
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.29/FPS
100%
Core i7-4860HQ vs Athlon 3000G in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4860HQ vs Athlon 3000G in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4860HQ vs Athlon 3000G in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4860HQ
Feb 1st, 2014
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
69%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Athlon 3000G
Nov 20th, 2019
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
67%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-4860HQ | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Athlon 3000G |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Feb 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1364 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
| Crystal Well | Codename | Picasso |
| 47 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Performance | ||
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Frequency | Non-Turbo |
6 MB | L3 Cache | 4 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 1600 MHz | RAM | DDR4 |
| Intel HD 5200 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
