Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900K outperforms Core i7-4810MQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-11900K is 2612 days newer than Core i7-4810MQ.
Advantages of Core i7-4810MQ
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900K - 47 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i9-11900K
- Performs up to 32% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i7-4810MQ - 683 vs 518 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4810MQ - 16 vs 8 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
683
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.65/FPS
100%
Price, €
€441.97
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €441.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8737 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2014
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-4810MQ | vs | Core i9-11900K |
---|---|---|
Jan 20th, 2014 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket G3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
47 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |