The Core i7-4770 is a much slower gaming CPU than the Celeron G6900. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i7-4770
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of the Celeron G6900
- A much faster CPU for gaming
Core i7-4770 vs Celeron G6900 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-4770
Jun 2nd, 2013
Average FPS
182
95%
Min 1% FPS
121
95%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Please refine your search results or...
Shoot us an email and we'll quickly add this!
Celeron G6900
Jan 4th, 2022
Average FPS
192
100%
Min 1% FPS
127
100%
Price, €
€79.65
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.41/FPS
100%
Core i7-4770 vs Celeron G6900 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4770 vs Celeron G6900 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4770 vs Celeron G6900 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4770
Jun 2nd, 2013
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
33%
Celeron G6900
Jan 4th, 2022
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-4770 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
$312.00 | MSRP | $52.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Haswell | Codename | Alder Lake |
84 W | Power Consumption | Not Available |
Performance | ||
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.4 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Frequency | Non-Turbo |
8 MB | L3 Cache | 4 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR3 @ 1600 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 4800 MHz |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
No | Overclockable | No |