In Battlefield 6, the Core i7-4765T is much slower than the Core i9-14900K and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $46 more expensive!
Core i7-4765T
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 72% less energy
Core i9-14900K
- Up to 106% faster in Battlefield 6 – 136 vs 66 FPS
- Up to 106% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 10 years and 4 months newer – Oct 17, 2023 vs Jun 02, 2013
- Is 10 years and 4 months newer
- Up to 9% cheaper – $452.68 vs $498.95
- Up to 9% cheaper
- Up to 56% better value in Battlefield 6 – $3.32 vs $7.55/FPS
- Up to 56% better value in Battlefield 6
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i7-4765T vs Core i9-14900K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-4765T
Jun 2nd, 2013
Average FPS
66 FPS
49%
Min 1% FPS
49 FPS
48%
Price, $
$498.95
90%
Value, $/FPS
$7.55/FPS
44%
Core i9-14900K
Oct 17th, 2023
Average FPS
136 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
102 FPS
100%
Price, $
$452.68
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.32/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4765T vs Core i9-14900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4765T vs Core i9-14900K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4765T
Jun 2nd, 2013
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
8 MB
22%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
62%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
50%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
29%
Core i9-14900K
Oct 17th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-4765T Jun 2nd, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900K Oct 17th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 2nd, 2013 | Released | Oct 17th, 2023 |
$303.00 | MSRP | $589.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1700 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
