Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms Core i7-4700HQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 3165 days newer than Core i7-4700HQ.
Advantages of Core i7-4700HQ
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Core i3-12100F - 47 vs 58 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-12100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 12% better in Elden Ring than Core i7-4700HQ - 131 vs 117 FPS
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i7-4700HQ
Mobile • May 27th, 2013
Core i3-12100F
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-4700HQ | vs | Core i3-12100F |
|---|---|---|
| May 27th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Haswell | Codename | Alder Lake |
| Intel BGA 1364 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
47 W | TDP | 58 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
