Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5700X3D outperforms Core i7-3940XM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 5700X3D is 4144 days newer than Core i7-3940XM.
Advantages of Core i7-3940XM
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D - 55 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 7 5700X3D
- Performs up to 9% better in Valheim than Core i7-3940XM - 209 vs 191 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3940XM - 16 vs 8 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
209
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.14/FPS
100%
Price, €
€238.85
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €238.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 53 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Mobile • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-3940XM | vs | Ryzen 7 5700X3D |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i7 Extreme | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Not Available |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |