Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms Core i7-3820QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600 is 2625 days newer than Core i7-3820QM.
Advantages of Core i7-3820QM
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3600 - 45 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 5 3600
- Performs up to 13% better in Ready or Not than Core i7-3820QM - 272 vs 241 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3820QM - 12 vs 8 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
272
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.3/FPS
100%
Price, €
€82.15
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €82.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 55 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-3820QM | vs | Ryzen 5 3600 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |