In Battlefield 6, the Core i7-3770K is slightly slower than the Ryzen 3 3200G and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $66 more expensive!
Core i7-3770K
No clear advantages
Ryzen 3 3200G
- Up to 10% faster in Battlefield 6 – 68 vs 62 FPS
- Up to 10% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 7 years and 2 months newer – Jul 07, 2019 vs Apr 29, 2012
- Is 7 years and 2 months newer
- Up to 50% cheaper – $65.98 vs $132.22
- Up to 50% cheaper
- Up to 54% better value in Battlefield 6 – $0.97 vs $2.13/FPS
- Up to 54% better value in Battlefield 6
- Consumes up to 16% less energy – 65 vs 77 Watts
- Consumes up to 16% less energy
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i7-3770K vs Ryzen 3 3200G: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-3770K
Apr 29th, 2012
Average FPS
62 FPS
91%
Min 1% FPS
47 FPS
92%
Price, $
$132.22
49%
Value, $/FPS
$2.13/FPS
46%
Ryzen 3 3200G
Jul 7th, 2019
Average FPS
68 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
51 FPS
100%
Price, $
$65.98
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.97/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-3770K vs Ryzen 3 3200G in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-3770K vs Ryzen 3 3200G in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-3770K
Apr 29th, 2012
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
98%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Ryzen 3 3200G
Jul 7th, 2019
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-3770K Apr 29th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 3 3200G Jul 7th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 29th, 2012 | Released | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| $313.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | AM4 |
| 77 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR4 |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated GPU | Radeon Vega 8 |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
