The Core i7-3770 is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i3-10300. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i7-3770
The Core i3-10300 is better in every way
Advantages of the Core i3-10300
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 16% less energy – 65 vs 77 Watts
Core i7-3770 vs Core i3-10300 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-3770
Apr 29th, 2012
Average FPS
171
90%
Min 1% FPS
115
92%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i3-10300
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
189
100%
Min 1% FPS
125
100%
Price, €
€208.45
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.1/FPS
100%
Core i7-3770 vs Core i3-10300 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-3770 vs Core i3-10300 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-3770 vs Core i3-10300 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-3770
Apr 29th, 2012
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
92%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
89%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
60%
Core i3-10300
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-3770 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i3-10300 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| $278.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
| 77 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Performance | ||
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.4 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.7 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.4 GHz |
| 8 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 1600 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2666 MHz |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
