In Battlefield 6, the Core i7-3740QM is much slower than the Core i9-14900K and it's also a slightly worse value for money, as it's only $239 cheaper!
Core i7-3740QM
- Up to 53% cheaper – $213.52 vs $452.68
- Up to 53% cheaper
- Consumes up to 64% less energy – 45 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 64% less energy
Core i9-14900K
- Up to 119% faster in Battlefield 6 – 136 vs 62 FPS
- Up to 119% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 11 years and 1 month newer – Oct 17, 2023 vs Sep 03, 2012
- Is 11 years and 1 month newer
- Up to 3% better value in Battlefield 6 – $3.32 vs $3.44/FPS
- Up to 3% better value in Battlefield 6
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i7-3740QM vs Core i9-14900K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-3740QM
Sep 3rd, 2012
Average FPS
62 FPS
46%
Min 1% FPS
46 FPS
45%
Price, $
$213.52
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.44/FPS
97%
Core i9-14900K
Oct 17th, 2023
Average FPS
136 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
102 FPS
100%
Price, $
$452.68
47%
Value, $/FPS
$3.32/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-3740QM vs Core i9-14900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-3740QM vs Core i9-14900K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-3740QM
Sep 3rd, 2012
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
6 MB
17%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
84%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
62%
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-14900K
Oct 17th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-3740QM Sep 3rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900K Oct 17th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 3rd, 2012 | Released | Oct 17th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $589.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG2 (988B) | Socket | LGA1700 |
45 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| unknown | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
