In Battlefield 6, the Core i7-3720QM is slower than the Ryzen 5 3600. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-3720QM
- Consumes up to 31% less energy – 45 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 31% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen 5 3600
- Up to 34% faster in Battlefield 6 – 83 vs 62 FPS
- Up to 34% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 7 years and 2 months newer – Jul 07, 2019 vs Apr 29, 2012
- Is 7 years and 2 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i7-3720QM vs Ryzen 5 3600: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen 5 3600
Jul 7th, 2019
Average FPS
83 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
62 FPS
100%
Price, $
$73.25
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.88/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-3720QM vs Ryzen 5 3600 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-3720QM vs Ryzen 5 3600 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-3720QM
Apr 29th, 2012
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
6 MB
19%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
72%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
86%
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 5 3600
Jul 7th, 2019
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-3720QM Apr 29th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 5 3600 Jul 7th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 29th, 2012 | Released | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| – | MSRP | $199.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG2 (988B) | Socket | AM4 |
45 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| unknown | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
