In Battlefield 6, the Core i7-3632QM is quite a bit slower than the Core i9-10850K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-3632QM
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 72% less energy
Core i9-10850K
- Up to 46% faster in Battlefield 6 – 89 vs 61 FPS
- Up to 46% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 7 years and 9 months newer – Jul 27, 2020 vs Oct 19, 2012
- Is 7 years and 9 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i7-3632QM vs Core i9-10850K: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-3632QM vs Core i9-10850K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-3632QM vs Core i9-10850K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-3632QM
Oct 19th, 2012
Cores
4-core
40%
L3 Cache
6 MB
30%
Base Frequency
2.2 GHz
61%
Turbo Frequency
3.2 GHz
62%
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-10850K
Jul 27th, 2020
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-3632QM Oct 19th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-10850K Jul 27th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 19th, 2012 | Released | Jul 27th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1224 | Socket | LGA1200 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| unknown | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
