Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3400G outperforms Core i7-3615QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3400G is 2625 days newer than Core i7-3615QM.
Advantages of Core i7-3615QM
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3400G - 45 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 5 3400G
- Performs up to 3% better in World of Tanks than Core i7-3615QM - 524 vs 507 FPS
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
524
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.16/FPS
100%
Price, €
€84.94
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €84.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 458 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-3615QM | vs | Ryzen 5 3400G |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Picasso |
Intel BGA 1224 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |