Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700F outperforms Core i7-3615QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-14700F is 4271 days newer than Core i7-3615QM.
Advantages of Core i7-3615QM
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-14700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i7-14700F
- Performs up to 80% better in Starfield than Core i7-3615QM - 81 vs 45 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3615QM - 28 vs 8 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-3615QM
Mobile • Apr 29th, 2012
Core i7-14700F
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-3615QM | vs | Core i7-14700F |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel BGA 1224 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 20 |
| 8 | Threads | 28 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
| 45 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
