In Battlefield 6, the Core i7-3520M is quite a bit slower than the Ryzen 7 5700G. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $131 cheaper!
Core i7-3520M
- Up to 71% cheaper – $53.99 vs $185.29
- Up to 71% cheaper
- Up to 54% better value in Battlefield 6 – $0.88 vs $1.93/FPS
- Up to 54% better value in Battlefield 6
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
Ryzen 7 5700G
- Up to 57% faster in Battlefield 6 – 96 vs 61 FPS
- Up to 57% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 8 years and 10 months newer – Apr 13, 2021 vs Jun 03, 2012
- Is 8 years and 10 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i7-3520M vs Ryzen 7 5700G: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-3520M
Jun 3rd, 2012
Average FPS
61 FPS
64%
Min 1% FPS
46 FPS
64%
Price, $
$53.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.88/FPS
100%
Ryzen 7 5700G
Apr 13th, 2021
Average FPS
96 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
72 FPS
100%
Price, $
$185.29
29%
Value, $/FPS
$1.93/FPS
46%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-3520M vs Ryzen 7 5700G in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-3520M vs Ryzen 7 5700G in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-3520M
Jun 3rd, 2012
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
4 MB
25%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
76%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
78%
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 7 5700G
Apr 13th, 2021
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-3520M Jun 3rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 7 5700G Apr 13th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 3rd, 2012 | Released | Apr 13th, 2021 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AM4 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| unknown | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated GPU | Radeon Vega 8 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
