Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700K outperforms Core i7-2920XM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-13700K is 4285 days newer than Core i7-2920XM.
Advantages of Core i7-2920XM
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700K - 55 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 91% better in Starfield than Core i7-2920XM - 82 vs 43 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2920XM - 24 vs 8 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
82
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.78/FPS
100%
Price, €
€392.14
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €392.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 139 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-2920XM | vs | Core i7-13700K |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i7 Extreme | Collection | Core i7 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |