The Core i7-2675QM is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Ryzen 5 3400G. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i7-2675QM
- Consumes up to 31% less energy – 45 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of the Ryzen 5 3400G
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
Core i7-2675QM vs Ryzen 5 3400G for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-2675QM
Oct 12th, 2011
Average FPS
167
93%
Min 1% FPS
112
93%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Ryzen 5 3400G
Jul 7th, 2019
Average FPS
180
100%
Min 1% FPS
120
100%
Price, €
€77.33
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.42/FPS
100%
Core i7-2675QM vs Ryzen 5 3400G in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-2675QM vs Ryzen 5 3400G in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-2675QM vs Ryzen 5 3400G in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-2675QM
Oct 12th, 2011
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.2 GHz
59%
Turbo Frequency
3.1 GHz
74%
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 5 3400G
Jul 7th, 2019
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
67%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-2675QM | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Ryzen 5 3400G |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $149.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1224 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Picasso |
45 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Performance | ||
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.2 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.7 GHz |
| 3.1 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.2 GHz |
6 MB | L3 Cache | 4 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| unknown | RAM | DDR4 @ 2933 MHz |
| Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
