Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms Core i7-2675QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 3123 days newer than Core i7-2675QM.
Advantages of Core i7-2675QM
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900K - 45 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 10% better in God of War than Core i7-2675QM - 179 vs 162 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2675QM - 20 vs 8 threads
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-2675QM
Mobile • Oct 12th, 2011
Core i9-10900K
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-2675QM | vs | Core i9-10900K |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel BGA 1224 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 10 |
| 8 | Threads | 20 |
| 2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 22.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
