In Battlefield 6, the Core i7-2630QM is slightly slower than the Ryzen 7 1700X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-2630QM
- Consumes up to 53% less energy – 45 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 53% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen 7 1700X
- Up to 18% faster in Battlefield 6 – 72 vs 61 FPS
- Up to 18% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 6 years and 1 month newer – Mar 02, 2017 vs Jan 03, 2011
- Is 6 years and 1 month newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i7-2630QM vs Ryzen 7 1700X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen 7 1700X
Mar 2nd, 2017
Average FPS
72 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
54 FPS
100%
Price, $
$195.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.72/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-2630QM vs Ryzen 7 1700X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-2630QM vs Ryzen 7 1700X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-2630QM
Jan 3rd, 2011
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
6 MB
38%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
59%
Turbo Frequency
2.9 GHz
76%
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 7 1700X
Mar 2nd, 2017
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-2630QM Jan 3rd, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 7 1700X Mar 2nd, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 3rd, 2011 | Released | Mar 2nd, 2017 |
| – | MSRP | $399.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG2 (988B) | Socket | AM4 |
45 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Other Features | ||
| unknown | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
