Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-13700K outperforms the more expensive Core i7-12700F on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-13700K is 266 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-12700F.
Advantages of Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 14% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i7-12700F - 567 vs 498 FPS
- Up to 16% cheaper than Core i7-12700F - €392.14 vs €469.00
- Up to 27% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i7-12700F - €0.69 vs €0.94 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-12700F - 24 vs 20 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-12700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i7-12700F
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
567
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.69/FPS
100%
Price, €
€392.14
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €392.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 326 minutes ago
Buy for €469 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 326 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-13700K | vs | Core i7-12700F |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 12 |
24 | Threads | 20 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
5.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |