Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400F outperforms Core i7-11800H on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12400F is 238 days newer than Core i7-11800H.
Advantages of Core i7-11800H
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i5-12400F - 45 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12400F - 16 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-12400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-12400F
- Performs up to 2% better in Overwatch 2 than Core i7-11800H - 378 vs 369 FPS
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i7-11800H
Mobile • May 11th, 2021
Core i5-12400F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-11800H | vs | Core i5-12400F |
|---|---|---|
| May 11th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Tiger Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
| Intel BGA 1787 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
