In Battlefield 6, the Core i7-10750H is slightly slower than the Core i9-10900X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-10750H
- Is 5 months and 13 days newer – Apr 02, 2020 vs Oct 19, 2019
- Is 5 months and 13 days newer
- Consumes up to 73% less energy – 45 vs 165 Watts
- Consumes up to 73% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-10900X
- Up to 9% faster in Battlefield 6 – 85 vs 78 FPS
- Up to 9% faster in Battlefield 6
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i7-10750H vs Core i9-10900X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-10900X
Oct 19th, 2019
Average FPS
85 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
64 FPS
100%
Price, $
$449.98
100%
Value, $/FPS
$5.29/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-10750H vs Core i9-10900X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-10750H vs Core i9-10900X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-10750H
Apr 2nd, 2020
Cores
6-core
60%
L3 Cache
12 MB
62%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
70%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Core i9-10900X
Oct 19th, 2019
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
19.25 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
94%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-10750H Apr 2nd, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-10900X Oct 19th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 2nd, 2020 | Released | Oct 19th, 2019 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | LGA2066 |
45 W | Power Consumption | 165 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2933 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR4 |
UHD Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
