In Battlefield 6, the Core i7-10700F is quite a bit faster than the Ryzen 3 3200G. However, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $264 more expensive!
Core i7-10700F
- Up to 25% faster in Battlefield 6 – 85 vs 68 FPS
- Up to 25% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 9 months and 24 days newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Jul 07, 2019
- Is 9 months and 24 days newer
Ryzen 3 3200G
- Up to 80% cheaper – $65.98 vs $329.95
- Up to 80% cheaper
- Up to 75% better value in Battlefield 6 – $0.97 vs $3.88/FPS
- Up to 75% better value in Battlefield 6
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i7-10700F vs Ryzen 3 3200G: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
85 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
64 FPS
100%
Price, $
$329.95
19%
Value, $/FPS
$3.88/FPS
25%
Ryzen 3 3200G
Jul 7th, 2019
Average FPS
68 FPS
80%
Min 1% FPS
51 FPS
80%
Price, $
$65.98
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.97/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-10700F vs Ryzen 3 3200G in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-10700F vs Ryzen 3 3200G in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
81%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Ryzen 3 3200G
Jul 7th, 2019
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
25%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
83%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-10700F Apr 30th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 3 3200G Jul 7th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 30th, 2020 | Released | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | AM4 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2933 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR4 |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Radeon Vega 8 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
