Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900HX outperforms Core i7-10700F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900HX is 1348 days newer than Core i7-10700F.
Advantages of Core i9-14900HX
- Performs up to 43% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i7-10700F - 562 vs 393 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10700F - 32 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i7-10700F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Core i9-14900HX
Mobile • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-10700F | vs | Core i9-14900HX |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel BGA 1964 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
| 8 | Cores | 24 |
| 16 | Threads | 32 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.2 GHz |
| 4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
| 65 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
