Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-10700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-10700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 320 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-10700.
Advantages of Core i7-10700
- Up to 28% cheaper than Core i9-11900F - €410.98 vs €572.00
- Up to 22% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-11900F - €3.07 vs €3.92 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 9% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-10700 - 146 vs 134 FPS
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
134
92%
Value, €/FPS
€3.07/FPS
100%
Price, €
€410.98
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €410.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 292 minutes ago
Buy for €572 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 292 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-10700 | vs | Core i9-11900F |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |