In Battlefield 6, the Core i7-1068NG7 is slightly slower than the Core i9-10900X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-1068NG7
- Consumes up to 83% less energy – 28 vs 165 Watts
- Consumes up to 83% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-10900X
- Up to 14% faster in Battlefield 6 – 84 vs 74 FPS
- Up to 14% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 2 months and 18 days newer – Oct 19, 2019 vs Aug 01, 2019
- Is 2 months and 18 days newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i7-1068NG7 vs Core i9-10900X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-10900X
Oct 19th, 2019
Average FPS
84 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
63 FPS
100%
Price, $
$449.98
100%
Value, $/FPS
$5.35/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-1068NG7 vs Core i9-10900X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-1068NG7 vs Core i9-10900X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-1068NG7
Aug 1st, 2019
Cores
4-core
40%
L3 Cache
8 MB
42%
Base Frequency
2.3 GHz
62%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
87%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Core i9-10900X
Oct 19th, 2019
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
19.25 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-1068NG7 Aug 1st, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-10900X Oct 19th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Aug 1st, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
| $320.00 | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1344 | Socket | LGA2066 |
28W | Power Consumption | 165W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR4 |
Iris Plus | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
