In Battlefield 6, the Core i5-L16G7 is much slower than the Core i7-14700F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-L16G7
- Consumes up to 89% less energy – 7 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 89% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-14700F
- Up to 107% faster in Battlefield 6 – 126 vs 61 FPS
- Up to 107% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 3 years and 6 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Jun 13, 2020
- Is 3 years and 6 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i5-L16G7 vs Core i7-14700F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-14700F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
126 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
94 FPS
100%
Price, $
$302.97
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.4/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-L16G7 vs Core i7-14700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-L16G7 vs Core i7-14700F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-L16G7
Jun 13th, 2020
Cores
5-core
25%
L3 Cache
4 MB
12%
Base Frequency
1.4 GHz
67%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
56%
Max. LPDDR4X RAM Speed
4267 MHz
76%
Core i7-14700F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
33 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-L16G7 Jun 13th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-14700F Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 13th, 2020 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
$281.00 | MSRP | $359.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Socket | LGA1700 | |
7 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 4267 MHz (LPDDR4X) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
UHD Graphics 64EU | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
