In Battlefield 6, the Core i5-9400F is quite a bit slower than the Ryzen 9 5950X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-9400F
- Consumes up to 38% less energy – 65 vs 105 Watts
- Consumes up to 38% less energy
Ryzen 9 5950X
- Up to 36% faster in Battlefield 6 – 103 vs 76 FPS
- Up to 36% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 1 year and 9 months newer – Nov 05, 2020 vs Jan 08, 2019
- Is 1 year and 9 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i5-9400F vs Ryzen 9 5950X: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-9400F
Jan 8th, 2019
Average FPS
76 FPS
74%
Min 1% FPS
57 FPS
74%
Price, $
$119.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.57/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-9400F vs Ryzen 9 5950X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-9400F vs Ryzen 9 5950X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-9400F
Jan 8th, 2019
Cores
6-core
38%
L3 Cache
9 MB
14%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
85%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
84%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
83%
Ryzen 9 5950X
Nov 5th, 2020
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
64 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-9400F Jan 8th, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 9 5950X Nov 5th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 8th, 2019 | Released | Nov 5th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | $799.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | AM4 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 105 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
