Core i5-7400T vs Core i7-4820K in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
The Core i5-7400T is at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the Core i7-4820K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i5-7400T
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 73% less energy – 35 vs 130 Watts
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU as it has integrated graphics
Advantages of the Core i7-4820K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 FPS Calculator
The CPU's performance with selected game settings
Core i5-7400T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
193
100%
Min 1% FPS
133
100%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i7-4820K
Sep 1st, 2013
Average FPS
185
96%
Min 1% FPS
128
96%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-7400T vs Core i7-4820K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-7400T vs Core i7-4820K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-7400T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
60%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
65%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
77%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Core i7-4820K
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
10 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-7400T | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-4820K |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 130 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 2400 MHz | RAM | DDR3 |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | No |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
