In Battlefield 6, the Core i5-6600K is quite a bit slower than the Core i9-13900KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-6600K
- Consumes up to 27% less energy – 91 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 27% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-13900KF
- Up to 78% faster in Battlefield 6 – 132 vs 74 FPS
- Up to 78% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 7 years and 1 month newer – Sep 27, 2022 vs Aug 05, 2015
- Is 7 years and 1 month newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i5-6600K vs Core i9-13900KF: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-13900KF
Sep 27th, 2022
Average FPS
132 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
99 FPS
100%
Price, $
$549
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.15/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-6600K vs Core i9-13900KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-6600K vs Core i9-13900KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-6600K
Aug 5th, 2015
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
6 MB
17%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
67%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
38%
Core i9-13900KF
Sep 27th, 2022
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
86%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-6600K Aug 5th, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-13900KF Sep 27th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Aug 5th, 2015 | Released | Sep 27th, 2022 |
$242.00 | MSRP | $564.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1700 |
91 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR3), 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
