Core i5-430M vs Core i9-9900KF in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
The Core i5-430M is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i9-9900KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i5-430M
- Consumes up to 63% less energy – 35 vs 95 Watts
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU as it has integrated graphics
Advantages of the Core i9-9900KF
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 16 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 FPS Calculator
The CPU's performance with selected game settings
Core i5-430M
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
178
85%
Min 1% FPS
124
87%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i9-9900KF
Jan 8th, 2019
Average FPS
209
100%
Min 1% FPS
143
100%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-430M vs Core i9-9900KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-430M vs Core i9-9900KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-430M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
3 MB
19%
Base Frequency
2.27 GHz
63%
Turbo Frequency
2.53 GHz
51%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-9900KF
Jan 8th, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-430M | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-9900KF |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $488.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | DDR4 @ 2666 MHz |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | No |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
