In Battlefield 6, the Core i5-3570K is quite a bit slower than the Core i7-10700KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-3570K
- Consumes up to 38% less energy – 77 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 38% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-10700KF
- Up to 42% faster in Battlefield 6 – 88 vs 62 FPS
- Up to 42% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 8 years and 1 day newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Apr 29, 2012
- Is 8 years and 1 day newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i5-3570K vs Core i7-10700KF: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-3570K
Apr 29th, 2012
Average FPS
62 FPS
70%
Min 1% FPS
47 FPS
71%
Price, $
$74.25
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.19/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-3570K vs Core i7-10700KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-3570K vs Core i7-10700KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-3570K
Apr 29th, 2012
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
6 MB
38%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
89%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
75%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
55%
Core i7-10700KF
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-3570K Apr 29th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-10700KF Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 29th, 2012 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| $212.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1200 |
77 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
