In Battlefield 6, the Core i5-3320M is quite a bit slower than the Core i9-11900F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-3320M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-11900F
- Up to 69% faster in Battlefield 6 – 103 vs 61 FPS
- Up to 69% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 8 years and 9 months newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Jun 01, 2012
- Is 8 years and 9 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i5-3320M vs Core i9-11900F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-3320M
Jun 1st, 2012
Average FPS
61 FPS
59%
Min 1% FPS
46 FPS
60%
Price, $
$65.05
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.06/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-3320M vs Core i9-11900F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-3320M vs Core i9-11900F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-3320M
Jun 1st, 2012
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
3 MB
19%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
63%
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-11900F
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
96%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-3320M Jun 1st, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-11900F Mar 16th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 1st, 2012 | Released | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| – | MSRP | $422.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | LGA1200 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| unknown | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
