In Battlefield 6, the Core i5-3230M is quite a bit slower than the Core i9-9980XE. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-3230M
- Consumes up to 79% less energy – 35 vs 165 Watts
- Consumes up to 79% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-9980XE
- Up to 39% faster in Battlefield 6 – 85 vs 61 FPS
- Up to 39% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 5 years and 9 months newer – Oct 19, 2018 vs Jan 01, 2013
- Is 5 years and 9 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i5-3230M vs Core i9-9980XE: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-3230M
Jan 1st, 2013
Average FPS
61 FPS
72%
Min 1% FPS
46 FPS
72%
Price, $
$99.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.63/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-3230M vs Core i9-9980XE in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-3230M vs Core i9-9980XE in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-3230M
Jan 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
11%
L3 Cache
3 MB
12%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
87%
Turbo Frequency
3.2 GHz
71%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-9980XE
Oct 19th, 2018
Cores
18-core
100%
L3 Cache
24.75 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-3230M Jan 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-9980XE Oct 19th, 2018 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 1st, 2013 | Released | Oct 19th, 2018 |
| – | MSRP | $1,979.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG2 (988B) | Socket | LGA2066 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 165 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
