In Battlefield 6, the Core i5-3210M is much slower than the Core i7-13700K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-3210M
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 72% less energy
Core i7-13700K
- Up to 110% faster in Battlefield 6 – 128 vs 61 FPS
- Up to 110% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 10 years and 3 months newer – Sep 27, 2022 vs Jun 01, 2012
- Is 10 years and 3 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i5-3210M vs Core i7-13700K: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-3210M vs Core i7-13700K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-3210M vs Core i7-13700K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-3210M
Jun 1st, 2012
Cores
2-core
12%
L3 Cache
3 MB
10%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
74%
Turbo Frequency
3.1 GHz
57%
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-13700K
Sep 27th, 2022
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-3210M Jun 1st, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-13700K Sep 27th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 1st, 2012 | Released | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $409.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG2 (988B) | Socket | LGA1700 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| unknown | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
