Key Differences
In short — Core i3-13100 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-13100 is 4378 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2400.
Advantages of Core i5-2400
- Up to 68% cheaper than Core i3-13100 - €39.90 vs €126.16
- Up to 59% better value when playing Lost Ark than Core i3-13100 - €0.18 vs €0.44 per FPS
Advantages of Core i3-13100
- Performs up to 27% better in Lost Ark than Core i5-2400 - 288 vs 226 FPS
- Consumes up to 37% less energy than Intel Core i5-2400 - 60 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2400 - 8 vs 4 threads
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €39.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8672 minutes ago
Buy for €126.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8672 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-2400 | vs | Core i3-13100 |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 60 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |