Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14600K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-13400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-13400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14600K is 286 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-13400F.
Advantages of Core i5-14600K
- Performs up to 5% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i5-13400F - 191 vs 182 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13400F - 20 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Up to 43% cheaper than Core i5-14600K - €148.14 vs €260.17
- Up to 40% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i5-14600K - €0.81 vs €1.36 per FPS
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
191
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.36/FPS
60%
Price, €
€260.17
56%
FPS Winner
Buy for €260.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 318 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
182
95%
Value, €/FPS
€0.81/FPS
100%
Price, €
€148.14
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €148.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 318 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-14600K | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Oct 17th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 10 |
20 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |