Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-13400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-13400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 99 days older than the cheaper Core i5-13400.
Advantages of Core i5-13400
- Up to 63% cheaper than Core i9-13900K - €184.33 vs €495.00
- Up to 60% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i9-13900K - €1.41 vs €3.56 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 6% better in Elden Ring than Core i5-13400 - 139 vs 131 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13400 - 32 vs 16 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
131
94%
Value, €/FPS
€1.41/FPS
100%
Price, €
€184.33
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €184.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1580 minutes ago
Buy for €495 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1581 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-13400 | vs | Core i9-13900K |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 24 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |