Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-12500 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-12500 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 365 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-12500.
Advantages of Core i5-12500
- Up to 62% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - €210.00 vs €553.72
- Up to 62% better value when playing Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Core i9-13900F - €0.88 vs €2.30 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 0% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Core i5-12500 - 241 vs 240 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12500 - 32 vs 12 threads
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
240
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.88/FPS
100%
Price, €
€210
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €210 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 267 minutes ago
Buy for €553.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 266 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-12500 | vs | Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |