Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-12500 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-12500 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600KF is 266 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-12500.
Advantages of Core i5-12500
- Up to 31% cheaper than Core i5-13600KF - €210.00 vs €305.66
- Up to 26% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i5-13600KF - €0.31 vs €0.42 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-13600KF
- Performs up to 9% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i5-12500 - 734 vs 675 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12500 - 20 vs 12 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €210 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 119 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
734
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.42/FPS
74%
Price, €
€305.66
68%
FPS Winner
Buy for €305.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 119 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-12500 | vs | Core i5-13600KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 14 |
12 | Threads | 20 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |