Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-12400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-12400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 266 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-12400.
Advantages of Core i5-12400
- Up to 31% cheaper than Core i9-13900K - €339.00 vs €493.00
- Up to 23% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-13900K - €2.32 vs €3.02 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 12% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-12400 - 163 vs 146 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12400 - 32 vs 12 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for €339 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 273 minutes ago
Buy for €493 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 273 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-12400 | vs | Core i9-13900K |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |