Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-11600K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-11600K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 945 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-11600K.
Advantages of Core i5-11600K
- Up to 47% cheaper than Core i9-14900K - €261.97 vs €494.19
- Up to 43% better value when playing Monster Hunter: World than Core i9-14900K - €0.98 vs €1.71 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 8% better in Monster Hunter: World than Core i5-11600K - 289 vs 268 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11600K - 32 vs 12 threads
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
268
93%
Value, €/FPS
€0.98/FPS
100%
Price, €
€261.97
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €261.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
289
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.71/FPS
57%
Price, €
€494.19
53%
FPS Winner
Buy for €494.19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-11600K | vs | Core i9-14900K |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |