Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms the cheaper Core i5-11600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-11600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 659 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-11600.
Advantages of Core i5-11600
- Up to 78% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - €252.97 vs €1169.00
- Up to 76% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - €1.25 vs €5.27 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 65 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 9% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-11600 - 222 vs 203 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11600 - 32 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
203
91%
Value, €/FPS
€1.25/FPS
100%
Price, €
€252.97
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €252.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 87 minutes ago
Buy for €1,169 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 87 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-11600 | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 120 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |