Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-11600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-11600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X is 560 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-11600.
Advantages of Core i5-11600
- Up to 67% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X - €252.97 vs €774.55
- Up to 64% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen 9 7950X - €1.74 vs €4.78 per FPS
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X - 65 vs 170 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X
- Performs up to 12% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-11600 - 162 vs 145 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11600 - 32 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
145
90%
Value, €/FPS
€1.74/FPS
100%
Price, €
€252.97
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €252.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 99 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
162
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.78/FPS
36%
Price, €
€774.55
32%
FPS Winner
Buy for €774.55 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 99 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-11600 | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 170 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 45.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |