Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-11600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-11600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700KF is 560 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-11600.
Advantages of Core i5-11600
- Up to 22% cheaper than Core i7-13700KF - €284.53 vs €364.25
- Up to 14% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i7-13700KF - €1.08 vs €1.26 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i7-13700KF
- Performs up to 10% better in Battlefield V than Core i5-11600 - 290 vs 263 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11600 - 24 vs 12 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
263
91%
Value, €/FPS
€1.08/FPS
100%
Price, €
€284.53
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €284.53 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 446 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
290
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.26/FPS
86%
Price, €
€364.25
78%
FPS Winner
Buy for €364.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 727 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-11600 | vs | Core i7-13700KF |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |