Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms Core i5-11320H on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 218 days newer than Core i5-11320H.
Advantages of Core i5-11320H
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-12100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 2% better in Battlefield 1 than Core i5-11320H - 253 vs 248 FPS
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-11320H
Mobile • Jun 21st, 2021
Core i3-12100F
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-11320H | vs | Core i3-12100F |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 21st, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Tiger Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
| Intel BGA 1449 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
| Not Available | TDP | 58 W |
| 10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Iris XE 96EU | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
