Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-13400F outperforms the more expensive Core i5-10600 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-13400F is 979 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-10600.
Advantages of Core i5-10600
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 5% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i5-10600 - 187 vs 178 FPS
- Up to 29% cheaper than Core i5-10600 - €148.10 vs €209.99
- Up to 33% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i5-10600 - €0.79 vs €1.18 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10600 - 16 vs 12 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €209.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 91 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
187
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.79/FPS
100%
Price, €
€148.1
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €148.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 90 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-10600 | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |