The Core i5-10500 is at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the Celeron G3930T. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i5-10500
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of the Celeron G3930T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
Core i5-10500 vs Celeron G3930T for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i5-10500
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
188
100%
Min 1% FPS
125
100%
Price, €
€291.72
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.55/FPS
100%
Celeron G3930T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
169
90%
Min 1% FPS
113
90%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i5-10500 vs Celeron G3930T in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-10500 vs Celeron G3930T in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-10500 vs Celeron G3930T in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-10500
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Celeron G3930T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
2 MB
17%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
87%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
90%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i5-10500 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Celeron G3930T |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Performance | ||
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.1 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.7 GHz |
| 4.5 GHz | Turbo Frequency | Non-Turbo |
12 MB | L3 Cache | 2 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 2666 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2400 MHz |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
