Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 1265 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10400F.
Advantages of Core i5-10400F
- Up to 56% cheaper than Core i9-14900KF - €205.00 vs €467.89
- Up to 27% better value when playing War Thunder than Core i9-14900KF - €1.13 vs €1.55 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 65% better in War Thunder than Core i5-10400F - 301 vs 182 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400F - 32 vs 12 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
182
60%
Value, €/FPS
€1.13/FPS
100%
Price, €
€205
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €205 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 36 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
301
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.55/FPS
73%
Price, €
€467.89
43%
FPS Winner
Buy for €467.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 326 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-10400F | vs | Core i9-14900KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |